Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the signal makes sense, it is similar to other signals in this file. What needs to be discussed is the values to use; shall we use "real abbreviation" like currently proposed, or something more enum-like as in existing signals. In https://covesa.github.io/vehicle_signal_specification/rule_set/data_entry/allowed/#recommendation-on-string-values we suggest to only use upper case (and numbers), but as we here are concerned with "real abbreviations" I see that this actually could be an OK exception. But I would like to get comments from others - do we want to keep it as is or do we prefer for example:
allowed: [‘PSI’, ‘KPA’, ’BAR’]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@erikbosch Thanks for quick review and good comment! I prefer to use upper case only like other signals. But as you said let's see the comments from others.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Meeting decision: Valid proposal, using upper case preferred, please update PR using upper case.
If updated and no objections received ready to be merged on next meeting
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@erikbosch Thanks! I have done the upper case changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@erikbosch We have mixture of abbreviation and full names.
Probably it is easier to have complete names for developers, but current proposal i think it should be fine as well