Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

datm strm_datadir path inconsistency #94

Closed
quantheory opened this issue Aug 4, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

datm strm_datadir path inconsistency #94

quantheory opened this issue Aug 4, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@quantheory
Copy link
Member

From Bugzilla:

http://bugs.cgd.ucar.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2028

https://svn-ccsm-models.cgd.ucar.edu/datm7/trunk_tags/datm8_140723/bld/namelist_files/namelist_defaults_datm.xml

All the supported CLM1PT paths looking something like:

atm/datm7/CLM1PT_data/NAME

See:

<strm_datdir stream="CLM1PT.1x1_mexicocityMEX">$DIN_LOC_ROOT/atm/datm7/CLM1PT_data/mexicocityMEX.c080124</strm_datdir>

<strm_datdir stream="CLM1PT.1x1_vancouverCAN">$DIN_LOC_ROOT/atm/datm7/CLM1PT_data/vancouverCAN.c080124 </strm_datdir>

<strm_datdir stream="CLM1PT.1x1_urbanc_alpha">$DIN_LOC_ROOT/atm/datm7/CLM1PT_data/urbanc_alpha.c080416 </strm_datdir>

But the path when CLM_USRDAT_NAME (PTCLM or manually) is inconsistent:

CLMFORC/NAME/CLM1PT_data

See:

<strm_datdir stream="CLM1PT.CLM_USRDAT">$DIN_LOC_ROOT_CLMFORC/$CLM_USRDAT_NAME/CLM1PT_data</strm_datdir>

This inconsistency is a bit confusing to users who are looking at the cesm input data as an example to build point data manually. It would be better to have everything be consistent. It probably makes the most sense to adopt the PTCLM/CLM_USRDAT for the predefined cases.

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

@ekluzek and @bandre-ucar - should this be fixed for cesm2?

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

Closing this old issue; I'm not sure if it has been fixed. Feel free to reopen in ESMCI/cime if necessary.

jedwards4b pushed a commit to jedwards4b/cime that referenced this issue May 31, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants