You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ceesem this changes the behavior. Before this, the radius needed to be specified in nm regardless of the units of the data. I think this changes it so that the radius needs to be specified in the same units as the data. I don't have a strong opinion about which behavior makes more sense (maybe slight preference for radius being in nm regardless of the data units), but this is a (small) breaking change. Should I adapt my code for this new behavior or was this unintentional and you'd like to revert the behavior?
f551838
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ceesem this changes the behavior. Before this, the radius needed to be specified in nm regardless of the units of the data. I think this changes it so that the radius needs to be specified in the same units as the data. I don't have a strong opinion about which behavior makes more sense (maybe slight preference for radius being in nm regardless of the data units), but this is a (small) breaking change. Should I adapt my code for this new behavior or was this unintentional and you'd like to revert the behavior?