Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update PAST node access pattern from Program instance #423

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

edopao
Copy link
Contributor

@edopao edopao commented Mar 22, 2024

GT4Py is introducing some changes in GridTools/gt4py#1500 which means the lowered PAST node is accessed differently from a Program instance. This PR updates the access pattern in Icon4Py.

@edopao
Copy link
Contributor Author

edopao commented Mar 22, 2024

launch jenkins spack

Copy link

Mandatory Tests

Please make sure you run these tests via comment before you merge!

  • cscs-ci run default
  • launch jenkins spack

Optional Tests

To run benchmarks you can use:

  • cscs-ci run benchmark

To run tests and benchmarks with the DaCe backend you can use:

  • cscs-ci run dace

In case your change might affect downstream icon-exclaim, please consider running

  • launch jenkins icon

For more detailed information please look at CI in the EXCLAIM universe.

@edopao
Copy link
Contributor Author

edopao commented Mar 22, 2024

launch jenkins spack

@edopao
Copy link
Contributor Author

edopao commented Mar 22, 2024

cscs-ci run default

@edopao edopao marked this pull request as ready for review March 22, 2024 13:49
@edopao edopao merged commit 335ab22 into main Mar 22, 2024
5 checks passed
@edopao edopao deleted the update-for-gt4py-1500 branch March 22, 2024 20:30
iomaganaris referenced this pull request in iomaganaris/icon4py Jun 18, 2024
* update PAST node access pattern from Program instance
* update gt4py-stable version
OngChia pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2025
* update PAST node access pattern from Program instance
* update gt4py-stable version
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants