Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update pro-bdt-015.md #594

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024
Merged

Update pro-bdt-015.md #594

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

sebFlores02
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request: Actualización de PRO-BDT-015

Descripción

Se actualizo el proceso para incluir un nuevo paso de verificación.

Cambios Realizados

  • docs/procesos/pro-bdt-015.md

Verificación

  • El versionamiento de la parte superior del documento coincide con la última versión de la tabla de control de cambios del documento.
  • El producto de trabajo y su última versión están actualizados en la Matriz de Configuración.
  • El producto de trabajo se encuentra registrado en todas las subprácticas del área al que pertence en el SCAMPI.

salgue441
salgue441 reviewed Jun 4, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@salgue441 salgue441 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agrega el análisis en el control de cambios

@sebFlores02
Copy link
Contributor Author

Agrega el análisis en el control de cambios

Ahorita que salve mi RF lo pongo

@salgue441 salgue441 merged commit b48838e into main Jun 4, 2024
1 check passed
@salgue441 salgue441 mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2024
Merged
@salgue441 salgue441 deleted the fix/Pro-bdt-015 branch June 8, 2024 00:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@salgue441 salgue441 salgue441 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@sebFlores02 @salgue441