Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OIDC Scope based model access #8343

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

krrishdholakia
Copy link
Contributor

@krrishdholakia krrishdholakia commented Feb 7, 2025

  • feat(handle_jwt.py): initial commit to allow scope based model access

  • feat(handle_jwt.py): allow model access based on token scopes

allow admin to control model access from IDP

  • test(test_jwt.py): add unit testing for scope based model access

  • docs(token_auth.md): add scope based model access to docs

  • docs(token_auth.md): update docs

  • docs(token_auth.md): update docs

  • build: add gemini commercial rate limits

  • fix: fix linting error

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 7, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
litellm ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 7, 2025 6:39am

@krrishdholakia krrishdholakia merged commit d720744 into main Feb 7, 2025
33 of 34 checks passed
@krrishdholakia krrishdholakia changed the title Litellm dev 02 06 2025 p3 OIDC Scope based model access Feb 7, 2025
abhijitherekar pushed a commit to acuvity/litellm that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2025
* feat(handle_jwt.py): initial commit to allow scope based model access

* feat(handle_jwt.py): allow model access based on token scopes

allow admin to control model access from IDP

* test(test_jwt.py): add unit testing for scope based model access

* docs(token_auth.md): add scope based model access to docs

* docs(token_auth.md): update docs

* docs(token_auth.md): update docs

* build: add gemini commercial rate limits

* fix: fix linting error
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant