-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem When Pushing Loads with and LoadCase which has alreacy been defined in RFEM6 #93
Problem When Pushing Loads with and LoadCase which has alreacy been defined in RFEM6 #93
Conversation
@BHoMBot check compliance |
@Arne-Martensen to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@Arne-Martensen to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check versioning |
@Arne-Martensen to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
There are 46 requests in the queue ahead of you. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided grasshopper file was used in order to first push the geometry followed by multiple load cases. Pushing multiple load cases when loads were already present did not lead to errors.
Later the pushed loads were pulled and nodal reactions were verified for multiple load cases.
Code was not reviewed.
@BHoMBot check compliance |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided grasshopper file was used in order to first push the geometry followed by multiple load cases. Pushing multiple load cases when loads were already present did not lead to errors.
Later the pushed loads were pulled and nodal reactions were verified for multiple load cases.
Code was not reviewed.
@BHoMBot check compliance |
@Arne-Martensen to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@Arne-Martensen to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check versioning |
@Arne-Martensen to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge |
@Arne-Martensen to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge |
@Arne-Martensen to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge |
@Arne-Martensen to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge |
@Arne-Martensen to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
NOTE: Depends on
Issues addressed by this PR
Push of Loads with and already existin LoadCase with an equivalent Nature results in an error messages and in the Load not beeing pushed into RFEM6.
Another minor issue that has been fixed was that the pull of nodal reactions was not possible from Excel due to some impossible casting to string. This has been taken care of.
Closes #92
Closes #94
Comparars for both LoadCases well as Section have been modifies. For the Testing please just Push all gemetrical elements and after that push all loads. The result should be Geometry in RFEM6 and Loads plus appopriatly names and numberated Loadcasese.
Please Try to read nodal loads from Both the GH file and the Excel File.
Test files
Link GH Script
Link Excel File
Changelog