Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AutoPR sql/resource-manager] Py version for SQL build #1951

Merged

Conversation

AutorestCI
Copy link
Contributor

@AutorestCI AutorestCI requested a review from jaredmoo as a code owner February 9, 2018 19:02
@lmazuel lmazuel merged commit fdf5a43 into restapi_auto_sql/resource-manager Feb 9, 2018
@lmazuel lmazuel deleted the restapi_auto_lmazuel_pysql branch February 9, 2018 19:13
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 9, 2018

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (restapi_auto_sql/resource-manager@64642fc). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 56.25%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                         Coverage Diff                          @@
##             restapi_auto_sql/resource-manager    #1951   +/-   ##
====================================================================
  Coverage                                     ?    52.8%           
====================================================================
  Files                                        ?     4705           
  Lines                                        ?   116542           
  Branches                                     ?        0           
====================================================================
  Hits                                         ?    61544           
  Misses                                       ?    54998           
  Partials                                     ?        0
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ure-mgmt-sql/azure/mgmt/sql/operations/__init__.py 100% <100%> (ø)
azure-mgmt-sql/azure/mgmt/sql/version.py 100% <100%> (ø)
...e-mgmt-sql/azure/mgmt/sql/sql_management_client.py 100% <100%> (ø)
azure-mgmt-sql/azure/mgmt/sql/models/__init__.py 100% <100%> (ø)
...l/operations/database_restore_points_operations.py 20.22% <16.66%> (ø)
...re/mgmt/sql/models/database_restore_point_paged.py 80% <50%> (ø)
...ql/azure/mgmt/sql/models/database_restore_point.py 45.45% <50%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 64642fc...fcf4d65. Read the comment docs.

AutorestCI added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2018
lmazuel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2018
… elastic pool operation (#2052)

* Extract databases, elastic pools, and check name availability from sql.core.json (#1829)

* Generated from 5a6fe19cfbfc33daf461404f3e77978e398bec49

Extract checkNameAvailability.json from sql.core.json

* Generated from b1f5dd6f842a458a6c117a2a5da68a7f5d895d77

Fixed cross-file references

* Update version.py

* Rebuild by #1950

* Generated from dbaf4f1b4a6a05888680e3b210813b8f2a1d98db (#1951)

Py version for SQL build

* Rebuild by #1950

* Generated from d2120e21ed90c81cfc47b30f813b1f3c0356e3ec

Update the cancel operations swagger on database and pool, and corresponding examples
AutorestCI added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2018
AutorestCI added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2018
… elastic pool operation (#2052)

* Extract databases, elastic pools, and check name availability from sql.core.json (#1829)

* Generated from 5a6fe19cfbfc33daf461404f3e77978e398bec49

Extract checkNameAvailability.json from sql.core.json

* Generated from b1f5dd6f842a458a6c117a2a5da68a7f5d895d77

Fixed cross-file references

* Update version.py

* Rebuild by #1950

* Generated from dbaf4f1b4a6a05888680e3b210813b8f2a1d98db (#1951)

Py version for SQL build

* Rebuild by #1950

* Generated from d2120e21ed90c81cfc47b30f813b1f3c0356e3ec

Update the cancel operations swagger on database and pool, and corresponding examples
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants