Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ServiceBus SDK: Rbac support #6393
ServiceBus SDK: Rbac support #6393
Changes from all commits
885eee2
2b52261
74f1416
f8d3f5f
ecdb825
47c385e
9579185
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need this rename? If we rename the public method then it becomes a breaking change.
If there's enough justification for the rename, lets update the major version in the csproj. #Closed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd suggest we consider avoiding the abbreviation here and go with something like
CreateAzureActiveDirectoryTokenProvider
for clarity. This class and method arepublic
and, therefore, discoverable/usable by consumers directly.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at #6393 (comment) wouldn't this change be handled in a separate (follow up) PR, @jsquire?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but I've referred back to this one in the issue that I opened to track, since there are several comments that were not addressed due to time constraints. I wanted to take one last pass and keep thoughts consolidated so that they're all in one place for future consideration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. Would expect to see these comments in the new PR with a reference to this PR as a starting point. Otherwise it looks like a call to action on the PR that has been approved 🙂
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.