-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create initial test-resources.json for tables #11538
Create initial test-resources.json for tables #11538
Conversation
This looks good but I would merge it along with at least one test that uses it. Do you have live pipeline setup? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
I only have the auto generated ones for CI etc. I was planning to work on setting up the pipeline next. |
{ | ||
request.Headers.Add("x-ms-client-request-id", requestId); | ||
} | ||
// Delete requests fail without this header. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we add it to swagger?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's debatable. I think the answer is yes.
Comparing notes with what happens in python, this header appears to not be required, although is harmless if added. In addition, I was able to run fiddler against Azure Storage Explorer in the portal, and it sends this header. The documentation doesn't mention it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's comment on the swagger PR at least and see how that goes.
No description provided.