-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New API spec for peering microsoft.peering 2022 01 01 #17280
New API spec for peering microsoft.peering 2022 01 01 #17280
Conversation
…01 to version 2022-01-01
Hi, @jjsridharan Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'PeerAsns_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L301 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'PeerAsns_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L342 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'RegisteredAsns_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L558 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'RegisteredAsns_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L613 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'RegisteredPrefixes_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L793 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'RegisteredPrefixes_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L848 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'Peerings_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L1028 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'Peerings_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L1076 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'Peerings_Update' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L1193 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'ConnectionMonitorTests_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L1425 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'ConnectionMonitorTests_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L1480 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'Prefixes_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L1745 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'Prefixes_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L1807 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'PeeringServices_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L2033 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'PeeringServices_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L2081 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'PeeringServices_Update' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L2192 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L2604 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L2644 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L2900 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L2981 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L3028 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L3079 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L3234 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L3241 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L3254 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L3522 |
R4041 - XmsIdentifierValidation |
Missing identifier id in array item property Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L3800 |
OperationId should contain the verb: 'lookingglass' in:'LookingGlass_Invoke'. Consider updating the operationId Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L189 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isPrimaryRegion Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L2422 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: useForPeeringService Location: Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json#L2611 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
~[Staging] ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️⚠️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes: 7 Warnings warning [Detail]
- Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.9.3)
- current:stable/2022-01-01/peering.json compared with base:stable/2021-06-01/peering.json
- current:stable/2022-01-01/peering.json compared with base:preview/2020-01-01-preview/peering.json
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
@jjsridharan the API Readiness Check failed, is the api version already deployed? |
@zhenglaizhang No, not yet. Is this mandatory for PR to get merged? (We will be deploying the new version in 1-2 weeks' time frame). |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Hi, @jjsridharan your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). |
yes, PR can not be merged until your service is deployed. Merging swagger to main branch means API release. But service deployment doesn't block PR review. Currently this PR is waiting for ARM review.
|
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved from ARM side.
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
@qiaozha @ArcturusZhang @msyyc pls check the sdk breaking changes. |
@ArcturusZhang can you please review/approve this PR ? |
specification/peering/resource-manager/Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
specification/peering/resource-manager/Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
specification/peering/resource-manager/Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
specification/peering/resource-manager/Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
specification/peering/resource-manager/Microsoft.Peering/stable/2022-01-01/peering.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…into dev-peering-Microsoft.Peering-2022-01-01
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM now - the go breaking changes are resolved
* Adding 2022-01-01 version for Peering * update Peering spec for 2022-01-01 * updating 2022-01-01 Peering spec * update swagger examples * Adds base for updating Microsoft.Peering from version stable/2021-06-01 to version 2022-01-01 * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * Creating new API spec version 2022-01-01 for Peering * Fix staging lint issues * update as per comment - updating x-ms-enum names Co-authored-by: Sridharan J <srij@microsoft.com>
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.