-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Circuit Simulator revival ? #944
Closed
Milestone
Comments
My thoughts as I go through recursive verifiers and circuit simulator and try to figure out an attack plan: https://hackmd.io/RhOpdxkmS0mTRb_W8kE_mw |
maramihali
pushed a commit
to AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
that referenced
this issue
Apr 30, 2024
This PR introduces the `CircuitSimulator` repurposed specifically to simulate native verifiers via the recursive verifiers, currently specialised for bn254. Currently the simulator is able to simulate the `UltraVerifier` and `GoblinUltraVerifier`. Resolves AztecProtocol/barretenberg#944. --------- Co-authored-by: maramihali <mara@aztecprotocol.com>
AztecBot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 1, 2024
This PR introduces the `CircuitSimulator` repurposed specifically to simulate native verifiers via the recursive verifiers, currently specialised for bn254. Currently the simulator is able to simulate the `UltraVerifier` and `GoblinUltraVerifier`. Resolves #944. --------- Co-authored-by: maramihali <mara@aztecprotocol.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Decide whether we revive the Circuit Simulator and run the native verifiers via the Circuit Simulator (and build the Rollup IVC). Establish how much work that will take
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: