Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update docs for blobs #9807

Closed
wants to merge 40 commits into from
Closed

docs: update docs for blobs #9807

wants to merge 40 commits into from

Conversation

MirandaWood
Copy link
Contributor

Please read contributing guidelines and remove this line.


As long as we use our tx effect fields as the $d_i$ values inside the circuit, and use the same $y$ and $z$ in the public inputs of the Honk L1 verification as input to the precompile, we have shown that $C$ indeed commits to our data. Note: I'm glossing over some details here which are explained in the links above (particularly the 'KZG Proof' and 'host of benefits' links).

But isn't evaluating $p(z)$ in the circuit also a bunch of very slow wrong-field arithmetic? No! Well, yes, but not as much as you'd think!
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a very enjoyable read !

Base automatically changed from mw/blob-circuit to master November 25, 2024 19:15
@MirandaWood MirandaWood closed this Feb 4, 2025
@MirandaWood MirandaWood deleted the mw/blob-docs branch February 4, 2025 16:57
rahul-kothari pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2025
Some docs for blobs.

Contination of #9807, but without the messed up commit history due to a
revert (plus updated info on multiple blobs)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants