Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we expand show_all_ etc to include collections APIs? #132

Closed
mjwestgate opened this issue Feb 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed

Should we expand show_all_ etc to include collections APIs? #132

mjwestgate opened this issue Feb 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mjwestgate
Copy link
Collaborator

At present, there is no way to get information on collections, providers, or data resources in R. However, the APIs are fairly straightforward;

Question: should we implement these? Doing so would require 6 new functions:

  • show_all_collections() and search_collections()
  • show_all_datasets() and search_datasets()
  • show_all_providers() and search_providers()

Although 6 new functions is a lot to add, the fact that they expand on existing syntax (i.e. show_all_ and search_) should mitigate the added complexity to some degree. However, the challenge here is that it may not be clear to users what the differences are between collections, providers, or data resources, and therefore which function they should use. We would also need to be clear about how to use this information in practice; i.e. what the resulting call to galah_filter() would look like.

@mjwestgate mjwestgate added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 8, 2022
mjwestgate added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2022
These are very basic implementations that make no attempt (yet) to implement features like caching. These will need better help files and user guides to be useful
@mjwestgate mjwestgate self-assigned this Jul 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants