-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IF: Implement proposer policy change #2078
Conversation
result.active_proposer_policy->proposer_schedule.version = result.header.schedule_version; | ||
result.proposer_policies = { ++it, proposer_policies.end() }; | ||
} else { | ||
result.proposer_policies = proposer_policies; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we also have here:
result.proposer_policy = proposer_policy;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could have swore I had that in there. Yes, we want result.active_proposer_policy = active_proposer_policy
. I can push a commit with that fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pushed
Note:start |
set_proposed_producer
in the next, next producer round.set_proposed_producer
is called in trx in any blocks of Producer A [ b1, b2, .. b12], the schedule change happens at Producer X [b1].pending_producers()
andproposed_producers
renamed to_legacy
.next_producers()
for use by external enties.Contents of hackmd doc:
Resolves #1980