Add example table to analysis/README

[sjspielman]

Inspired by the brief conversation in #945 about naming, I took a stab at expanding analysis/README.md with a table indicating which modules are provided as examples of some flavor, rather than bona fide scientific analyses.

Let me know what you think!

[sjspielman]

Might need to rethink this, since the seurat-conversion module is actually doing conversions, not necessarily demonstrating usage, which indeed we may not need to demonstrate now that we're planning on providing objects(?).

[jashapiro]

Might need to rethink this, since the seurat-conversion module is actually doing conversions, not necessarily demonstrating usage, which indeed we may not need to demonstrate now that we're planning on providing objects(?).

Yeah, I don't have plans to create notebooks for Seurat conversion. It might be nice to have some demonstrations if people want to work with some of the options, but I actually think this may be better provided in the docs.

[sjspielman]

I think this README is still helpful, so I'll just rip out that line in the table.

[jashapiro]

Since this is displayed on the page, do we want the names to be links to the modules themselves?

[jashapiro]

LGTM, with typo fix.

But now I'm a bit worried the links might not work as they are. I don't think a full url is worth doing, but I guess we can test after merge.

[sjspielman]

But now I'm a bit worried the links might not work as they are. I don't think a full url is worth doing, but I guess we can test after merge.

Already tested in my fork :) https://github.com/sjspielman/OpenScPCA-analysis/tree/sjspielman/update-analysis-readme/analyses

edit - except clearly i didn't test the last line 😬 . it works now!