This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 21, 2023. It is now read-only.
PBTA Histologies v19 Part 2 of N: Update independent samples #1040
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose/implementation Section
What scientific question is your analysis addressing?
Rna summary modules needed for subtyping need to be updated because BS_JXF8A2A6 is removed as per #862. In this PR I'm re-running the independent-samples module.
independent-samples
results/independent-specimens.wgs.primary.tsv
(included in data download)results/independent-specimens.wgs.primary-plus.tsv
(included in data download)results/independent-specimens.wgswxs.primary.tsv
(included in data download)results/independent-specimens.wgswxs.primary-plus.tsv
(included in data download)results/independent-specimens.rnaseq.primary-plus-stranded.tsv
(included in data download)results/independent-specimens.rnaseq.primary-plus-polya.tsv
(included in data download)What was your approach?
Just re-run as part of the scripts/run-for-subtyping.sh in kgaonkar6:v19-release in #1028
Then create a new branch for module specific review:
git checkout v19-release analyses/independent-samples/
What GitHub issue does your pull request address?
#867
Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
NA
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
NA
Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?
yes
Results
What types of results are included (e.g., table, figure)?
tables
What is your summary of the results?
Some rna-seq sample selections have changed I believe because of the random selection
Reproducibility Checklist
Documentation Checklist
README
and it is up to date.analyses/README.md
and the entry is up to date.