You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 21, 2023. It is now read-only.
As outlined in #967, we would like to integrate some of the information in pathology_free_text diagnosis to the integrated_diagnosis or harmonized_diagnosis. For this ticket, we will further subtype Craniopharyngioma samples which may have been annotated as "To be classified" since they lacked canonical mutations which subtype the samples. In addition, for adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma, the b-catenin SNV is not present in 100% of these samples. Ref:
In our cohort of ACP specimens from 117 patients we found CTNNB1 mutations in 89 cases (76.1%).
> v18 %>%
+ filter(pathology_diagnosis == "Craniopharyngioma") %>%
+ filter(grepl("adam", pathology_free_text_diagnosis) & molecular_subtype == "CRANIO, To be classified") %>%
+ select(sample_id, pathology_free_text_diagnosis, molecular_subtype)%>%
+ distinct()
# A tibble: 2 x 3
sample_id pathology_free_text_diagnosis molecular_subtype
<chr> <chr> <chr>
1 7316-3891 adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma CRANIO, To be classified
2 7316-1795 craniopharyngioma, adamantinomatous type, who grade i CRANIO, To be classified
I checked both of these pathology reports and indeed, the samples were described as Adamantinomatous, therefore, I think we can update these by specific sample, rather than rules, since they have been confirmed, into integrated_diagnosis and molecular_subtype.
What changes need to be made? Please provide enough detail for another participant to make the update.
Add to the above samples:
broad_histology
short_histology
harmonized_diagnosis
molecular_subtype
Tumors of sellar region
Craniopharyngioma
Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma
CRANIO, ADAM
What input data should be used? Which data were used in the version being updated?
pbta-histologies.tsv
When do you expect the revised analysis will be completed?
* Add CRANIO, ADAM subtyping notebook per #994
* Update HTML
* Add ACP notebook to shell script
* Response to review comments
* Use base histologies file
* Revert "Use base histologies file"
This reverts commit 1f5f4a2.
* Use compiled subtypes file
* Update filename in shell script
* Include tumor_descriptor, rerun w/ v19
What analysis module should be updated and why?
As outlined in #967, we would like to integrate some of the information in
pathology_free_text
diagnosis to theintegrated_diagnosis
orharmonized_diagnosis
. For this ticket, we will further subtype Craniopharyngioma samples which may have been annotated as "To be classified" since they lacked canonical mutations which subtype the samples. In addition, for adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma, the b-catenin SNV is not present in 100% of these samples. Ref:Below are the samples which were not able to be classified by molecular-subtyping-CRANIO, but which
I checked both of these pathology reports and indeed, the samples were described as
Adamantinomatous
, therefore, I think we can update these by specific sample, rather than rules, since they have been confirmed, intointegrated_diagnosis
andmolecular_subtype
.What changes need to be made? Please provide enough detail for another participant to make the update.
Add to the above samples:
What input data should be used? Which data were used in the version being updated?
pbta-histologies.tsv
When do you expect the revised analysis will be completed?
this week
Who will complete the updated analysis?
@kgaonkar6 or @jharenza
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: