Why reactance is a required field for transmission lines? #37
Answered
by
iSoron
mzy2240
asked this question in
Help & FAQ
-
|
for DCOPF without phase shifting angles, I did not see a reason why we need reactance. Also I did not find a use case in the source code. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
iSoron
Jul 13, 2023
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Good catch; it should be optional. We currently only use susceptance. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Removed in 58cc33a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answer selected by
iSoron
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Good catch; it should be optional. We currently only use susceptance.