Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need another overload of the operator= for ParticleIDWrapper and ParticleCPUWrapper. #1317

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2020

Conversation

atmyers
Copy link
Member

@atmyers atmyers commented Aug 27, 2020

The proposed changes:

  • fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX
  • add new capabilities to AMReX
  • changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
  • are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX users
  • are described in the proposed changes to the AMReX documentation, if appropriate

@atmyers atmyers requested a review from WeiqunZhang August 27, 2020 22:35
@WeiqunZhang WeiqunZhang merged commit 6dd02ab into AMReX-Codes:development Aug 28, 2020
kweide pushed a commit to ECP-Astro/amrex that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2020
…icleCPUWrapper. (AMReX-Codes#1317)

The proposed changes:
- [x] fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX
- [ ] add new capabilities to AMReX
- [ ] changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
- [ ] are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX users
- [ ] are described in the proposed changes to the AMReX documentation, if appropriate
kweide added a commit to ECP-Astro/amrex that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2020
dwillcox pushed a commit to dwillcox/amrex that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2020
…icleCPUWrapper. (AMReX-Codes#1317)

The proposed changes:
- [x] fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX
- [ ] add new capabilities to AMReX
- [ ] changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
- [ ] are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX users
- [ ] are described in the proposed changes to the AMReX documentation, if appropriate
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants