Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question about anchor scales #20

Open
xiong233 opened this issue Jul 4, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

question about anchor scales #20

xiong233 opened this issue Jul 4, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@xiong233
Copy link

xiong233 commented Jul 4, 2019

Hello, I am running the original baseline from KITTI to cityscape. When I use ANCHOR_SCALES=[8,16,32], I get similar results in your paper, but when I adjust ANCHOR_SCALES to [4, 8, 16,32], I got a very high result about 42% on the baseline, much higher than the results of your paper. It seems that domain adaptation on this dataset doesn't seem to work, but it's also possible that something went wrong when I implemented it. Could you set ANCHOR_SCALES to [4, 8,16,32] and run it? Thank You!

@yuhuayc
Copy link
Owner

yuhuayc commented Jul 7, 2019

That's very interesting! thanks for the information. I will try to do some experiments and let you know the outcome!

@MaddyThakker
Copy link

@yuhuayc any updates on this?

@MaddyThakker
Copy link

@xiong233 while replicating the results, in the source dataset, did you use only "car" class bounding boxes for training?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants