From a35b1048b733f056ede1d33bb50fb487966ec28c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott O'Hara The intent of this Success Criterion is to ensure that Assistive Technologies (AT)
- can gather information about, activate(or set) and keep up to date on the status of
+ can gather accurate information about, activate (or set) and keep up to date on the status of
user interface controls in the content.
When standard controls from accessible technologies are used, this process is straightforward.
If the user interface elements are used according to specification the conditions
- of this provision will be met. (See examples of Success Criterion 4.1.2 below)
+ of this provision will be met. (See examples of Success Criterion 4.1.2 below)
If custom controls are created, however, or interface elements are programmed (in
code or script) to have a different role and/or function than usual, then additional
- measures need to be taken to ensure that the controls provide important information
+ measures need to be taken to ensure that the controls provide important and accurate information
to assistive technologies and allow themselves to be controlled by assistive technologies.
Intent of Name, Role, Value
Intent of Name, Role, Value
of user interface control state are whether or not a checkbox or radio button has
been selected, or whether or not a collapsible tree or list node is expanded or collapsed.
Success Criterion 4.1.2 requires a programmatically determinable name for all user
From 3f768059d3be7d6ec40649766ca38f021a5f6298 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott O'Hara The intent of this Success Criterion is to ensure that Assistive Technologies (AT)
- can gather accurate information about, activate (or set) and keep up to date on the status of
+ can gather appropriate information about, activate (or set) and keep up to date on the status of
user interface controls in the content.
If custom controls are created, however, or interface elements are programmed (in
code or script) to have a different role and/or function than usual, then additional
- measures need to be taken to ensure that the controls provide important and accurate information
+ measures need to be taken to ensure that the controls provide important and appropriate information
to assistive technologies and allow themselves to be controlled by assistive technologies.
Intent of Name, Role, Value
Intent of Name, Role, Value
Intent of Name, Role, Value
measures need to be taken to ensure that the controls provide important and appropriate information
to assistive technologies and allow themselves to be controlled by assistive technologies.
What roles and states are appropriate to convey to assistive technology will be determined + by what the control represents. Specifics about such information are defined by other + specifications, such as WAI-ARIA, or the + appropriate platform standards. Another factor to consider is whether there is sufficient + support in assistive technologies to convey the information as specified. +
A particularly important state of a user interface control is whether or not it has focus. The focus state of a control can be programmatically determined, and notifications @@ -39,8 +46,8 @@
Success Criterion 4.1.2 requires a programmatically determinable name for all user - interface components. Names may be visible or invisible. Occasionally, the name must - be visible, in which case it is identified as a label. Refer to the definition of + interface components. Names may be visible or invisible. Occasionally, the name needs + to be visible, in which case it is identified as a label. Refer to the definition of name and label in the glossary for more information.
From 4e721b661ec4ac6fc5a9900b139b360dd9e20ba9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Scott O'HaraWhat roles and states are appropriate to convey to assistive technology will be determined +
What roles and states are appropriate to convey to assistive technology will depend
by what the control represents. Specifics about such information are defined by other
specifications, such as WAI-ARIA, or the
appropriate platform standards. Another factor to consider is whether there is sufficient
From 0f7907578b4b7066c57938df0272b185e57d29f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott O'Hara Intent of Name, Role, Value
What roles and states are appropriate to convey to assistive technology will depend
- by what the control represents. Specifics about such information are defined by other
+ on what the control represents. Specifics about such information are defined by other
specifications, such as WAI-ARIA, or the
appropriate platform standards. Another factor to consider is whether there is sufficient
support in assistive technologies to convey the information as specified.
From 4e7f11d0fbeedcafd1918f15584e23bb04ede979 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Gower What roles and states are appropriate to convey to assistive technology will depend
on what the control represents. Specifics about such information are defined by other
specifications, such as WAI-ARIA, or the
- appropriate platform standards. Another factor to consider is whether there is sufficient
+ relevant platform standards. Another factor to consider is whether there is sufficient
support in assistive technologies to convey the information as specified.
Intent of Name, Role, Value
Intent of Name, Role, Value
on what the control represents. Specifics about such information are defined by other
specifications, such as WAI-ARIA, or the
relevant platform standards. Another factor to consider is whether there is sufficient
- support in assistive technologies to convey the information as specified.
+ accessibility support
+ with assistive technologies to convey the information as specified.
A particularly important state of a user interface control is whether or not it has