Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use port explicitly #3164

Closed
critical27 opened this issue Oct 20, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Use port explicitly #3164

critical27 opened this issue Oct 20, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
type/enhancement Type: make the code neat or more efficient

Comments

@critical27
Copy link
Contributor

Storage will use at least four port: storage/raft/admin/toss port, add many weird code +1, -1 and so on. We'd better pass the port explicitly in the config file.
@critical27 critical27 added the type/enhancement Type: make the code neat or more efficient label Oct 20, 2021
@jamieliu1023 jamieliu1023 mentioned this issue Nov 1, 2021
Closed
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie moved this from Todo to Backlog in Nebula Graph v3.1.0 Jan 20, 2022
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added this to the v3.1.0 milestone Jan 26, 2022
@critical27 critical27 moved this from Backlog to Todo in Nebula Graph v3.1.0 Feb 11, 2022
@critical27 critical27 moved this from Todo to Backlog in Nebula Graph v3.1.0 Feb 11, 2022
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie moved this from Backlog to Todo in Nebula Graph v3.1.0 Feb 11, 2022
@randomJoe211 randomJoe211 self-assigned this Feb 28, 2022
@critical27
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could do in GQL version later

Repository owner moved this from Todo to Done in Nebula Graph v3.1.0 Mar 3, 2022
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie removed this from the v3.1.0 milestone Mar 3, 2022
@jamieliu1023 jamieliu1023 mentioned this issue Mar 5, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type/enhancement Type: make the code neat or more efficient
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@critical27 @randomJoe211 @Sophie-Xie