You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This document still fails WCAG 4.1.2 test 15 ("Paragraph is incorrectly tagged as a numbered heading") on page 34 for the line "4.2.1 Binnensportaccomodatie". This is clearly a heading, so this is a false positive.
Possibly the algorithm notes that the format of this line is the same as that of the heading directly above "4.2. Analyse accommodatiebestand in relatie tot de ontwikkelingen", but it is still obviously a heading because of the formatting and because it continues the numbering.
Can you look into this case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We already take into account the presence of the numbering and the bold font. It is just not enough in this case to be classified as a heading, since the preceding and the following blocks of text are also bold and have the identical font size.
We can still use the fact that the block below is bold+italic, so in fact has a different formatting.
Another important marker is that "4.2.1 Binnensportaccomodatie" does appear in the TOC. With the new TOC support we can recognize this and add as an extra criterium for heading detection.
@jzuidweg The elements 4. Ontwikkelingsrichtingen periode 2021-2030 (on page 33) and 4.2.3 Gebruikstarieven (on page 37) are tagged as paragraphs in the document and we are correctly detect that this should be tagged as headings.
This document still fails WCAG 4.1.2 test 15 ("Paragraph is incorrectly tagged as a numbered heading") on page 34 for the line "4.2.1 Binnensportaccomodatie". This is clearly a heading, so this is a false positive.
Possibly the algorithm notes that the format of this line is the same as that of the heading directly above "4.2. Analyse accommodatiebestand in relatie tot de ontwikkelingen", but it is still obviously a heading because of the formatting and because it continues the numbering.
Can you look into this case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: