-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Function Network Test Failure for Only milne test package on devel (does not fail on release) #320
Comments
Here's context on the attempted workaround and current syntax: https://roxygen2.r-lib.org/articles/rd-other.html#r6 |
I updated |
Update: seems to failing within the https://github.com/r-lib/R6/blob/main/NEWS.md
https://github.com/r-lib/R6/blob/507867875fdeaffbe7f7038291256b798f6bb042/R/clone.R#L12-L27 |
Ultimately, that code as written in R6, when parsed with our parsing logic in |
Hi, I authored that change and I've been following this thread. Unfortunately I fail to see how my change was related to this issue. It seems there is a PR with a possible fix on the If there is anything I can help with feel free to mention me here, I'll do my best to help. Cheers! |
To clarify, these errors were caused by |
Closed by #322 |
Documenting this one weird test failure on
devel
that unfortunately still occurs after current changes in PR #318. Appreciate input before diving that much deeper.Context:
When running our (fancy new)
release
workflow, we get these unit test failures:checkRd: (-1) FunctionReporter.Rd:98-102: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
type failures. This indicates to me that accommodation for theRoxygen2
DESCRIPTION file "Roxygen: list(r6 = FALSE)
" workaround is being dropped in upcoming R versions 😢 .milne
, our test package for exclusively R6 object packages. For that, the log is as follows:[.... and so on ....]
Assumption:
They are related failures. Why?
.parse_function
but not.parse_R6_expression
which is being called here.Plan:
DESCRIPTION
files to align with Roxygen settings that ignore standard R6 object documentation. (Didn't work 😢 )Any thoughts @jayqi ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: