Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

missing reflectivity when using NSSL microphysics, Cu and inline post #2126

Closed
JiliDong-NOAA opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2113
Closed

missing reflectivity when using NSSL microphysics, Cu and inline post #2126

JiliDong-NOAA opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2113
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@JiliDong-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

Description

When running RRFS ensemble members using NSSL microphysics and Cu with inline post on, there are areas of missing reflectivity. This is caused by UPP not having the correct hook for reflectivity processing with imp_physics=17/18 (NSSL microphysics).

To Reproduce:

run rrfs forecast with NSSL microphysics and Cu. Have inline post on
check the reflectivity for areas of missing values

Additional context

Output

See slides for reflectivity before and after fix:
missing_refl_forPR.pptx

@JiliDong-NOAA JiliDong-NOAA added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 6, 2024
@JiliDong-NOAA JiliDong-NOAA mentioned this issue Feb 6, 2024
41 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant