-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 745
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hiding old versions #383
Comments
Thinking out loud, if the version is supported by upstream we should hide it by default, and then we should have a flag to show the remaining unsupported versions. We would just have to update n with the end of life schedule whenever upstream does. That should be simple though. |
I think the fix that makes the last assumptions is showing the 5 (or so) latest installations with the |
That sound great @qw3rtman. |
I came across this old discussion and liked the concept of limiting (much like
|
It will be a while before this gets considered for |
This issue has not had any activity in over six months. It isn't likely to get acted on due to this report. Although I like the idea so might do it at some point anyway! Feel free to open a new issue if it comes up again, with new information and renewed interest. Thank you for your contributions. |
Prerelease available via |
Hello,
When I type
n ls
into my terminal window, I get this:(sorry for long break)
There're 310 versions in that list. If you check out this page, you'll see a release schedule of Node.js. The first 254 versions in the list are from 0.x era, furthermore, only 48 of them are 0.10.x and 17 of them are 0.12.x. There's also 19 of 5.x versions are in the list, which are completely out of scope.
In 2016, I don't -want to- believe anyone starts a project with a 0.8.x version which is more than 3 years old, or 5.x version which is not supported anymore, or a middle version when there is a more up to date one. So, they're just useless items in the list. Also, 0.10.x is at the end of its maintenance phase now, and in less than 2 months 0.12.x will also be in the same place.
My suggestion is to add an argument like
--all
(and/or-a
) to show the list above, and in a normal usage, to hide all the unnecessary/inactive versions. Only the latest couple of releases from each supported version is enough to choose from.So, something like this now:
and something like this in two months:
So, what do you think? Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: