You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Actual behaviour
For instance with the prompt building, with a batch count of 2, you'll get output names like:
00675-1600648804-building.png
00676-1600648805-building.png
Expected behaviour
So the 1600648804 in the second depth image name should be incremented by 1. This can be a bit a frustration when creating similar depth maps because the numbering is the same. This also makes it so the depth image won't give the correct information to png_info.
Some of the observations I've made processed.seed that is used during saving seems to be only the initial seed. There should have some sort of n_iter or batch count index added to it. It would be nice to do something like processed.seed + processed.n_iter ; however, n_iter isn't attached to processed.
Possible solution
Changing processed.seed to processed.all_seeds[count-1] does seem to work. I haven't tested it for every situation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Actual behaviour
For instance with the prompt building, with a batch count of 2, you'll get output names like:
00675-1600648804-building.png
00676-1600648805-building.png
00677-1600648804-building_depth.png
00678-1600648804-building_depth.png
Expected behaviour
So the 1600648804 in the second depth image name should be incremented by 1. This can be a bit a frustration when creating similar depth maps because the numbering is the same. This also makes it so the depth image won't give the correct information to png_info.
Some of the observations I've made
processed.seed
that is used during saving seems to be only the initial seed. There should have some sort ofn_iter
or batch count index added to it. It would be nice to do something likeprocessed.seed + processed.n_iter
; however,n_iter
isn't attached toprocessed
.Possible solution
Changing
processed.seed
toprocessed.all_seeds[count-1]
does seem to work. I haven't tested it for every situation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: