False positive DAR101 and DAR102 with raw docstring and variadic arguments.

[MT-0]

With the test.py file:

def test_function(*args: int) -> int:
    r"""Test a docstring with variadic arguments.
    
    Args:
        \*args:
            A list of integers.
    
    Returns:
        int: The first number else 0.
    """
    return args[0] if args else 0

and the .darglint file:

[darglint]
docstring_style = google
strictness = full

Running darglint test.py outputs:

test.py:test_function:4: DAR101: - *args
test.py:test_function:5: DAR102: + \*args

[terrencepreilly]

It's because of the backslash. A backslash isn't necessary, because there's no pattern matching or anything; an '' is just an ''. You should be able to change "*args" to "*args" or "args" and it ought to work.

[MT-0]

This arose from a conflict between the errors raise by darglint and flake8-rst-docstrings. The above code validates using flake8-rst-docstrings but does not in darglint and removing the backslash then the reverse is true.

Looking at https://sphinxcontrib-napoleon.readthedocs.io/en/latest/example_google.html#example-google then it seems that the backslash is expected outside the "Args" section (so that * is not interpreted as the start of an emphasis block) but there is a special case in the "Args" section where it is not expected.

It looks like there is an open issue in flake8-rst-docstrings about this and it needs fixing at their end rather than in this package.