status | title | creation-date | last-updated | authors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
implemented |
Ignore Step Errors |
2021-01-06 |
2021-08-11 |
|
Tekton tasks are defined as a collection of steps in which each step can specify a container image to run. Steps are executed in order in which they are specified. One single step failure results in a task failure i.e., once a step results in a failure, rest of the steps are not executed. When a container exits with non-zero exit code, the step results in error:
$ kubectl get tr failing-taskrun-hw5xj -o json | jq .status.steps
[
{
"container": "step-failing-step",
"imageID": "...",
"name": "failing-step",
"terminated": {
"containerID": "...",
"exitCode": 244,
"finishedAt": "2021-02-02T18:27:46Z",
"reason": "Error",
"startedAt": "2021-02-02T18:27:46Z"
}
}
]
TaskRun
with such step error, stops executing subsequent steps and results in a failure:
$ kubectl get tr failing-taskrun-hw5xj -o json | jq .status.conditions
[
{
"lastTransitionTime": "2021-02-02T18:27:47Z",
"message": "\"step-failing-step\" exited with code 244 (image: \"..."); for logs run: kubectl -n default logs failing-taskrun-hw5xj-pod-wj6vn -c step-failing-step\n",
"reason": "Failed",
"status": "False",
"type": "Succeeded"
}
]
If such a task with a failing step is part of a pipeline, the pipelineRun
stops executing and subsequent steps in that
task (similar to taskRun
) stop executing any other task in the pipeline which results in a pipeline failure.
$ kubectl get pr pipelinerun-with-failing-step-csmjr -o json | jq .status.conditions
[
{
"lastTransitionTime": "2021-02-02T18:51:15Z",
"message": "Tasks Completed: 1 (Failed: 1, Cancelled 0), Skipped: 3",
"reason": "Failed",
"status": "False",
"type": "Succeeded"
}
]
Many common tasks have the requirement where a step failure must not stop executing the rest of the steps. In order to continue executing subsequent steps, task authors have the flexibility of wrapping an image and exiting that step with success. This changes the failing step into a success and does not block further execution. But, this is a workaround and only works with images that can be wrapped:
steps:
- image: docker.io/library/golang:latest
name: ignore-unit-test-failure
script: |
go test .
TEST_EXIT_CODE=$?
if [ $TEST_EXIT_CODE != 0 ]; then
exit 0
fi
This workaround does not apply to off-the-shelf container images.
As a pipeline execution engine, we want to support off-the-shelf container images as a step, and provide the option to ignore such step errors. The task author can choose to continue execution, capture the original non-zero exit code, and make it available for the rest of the steps in that task.
Issue: tektoncd/pipeline#2800
It should be possible to easily use off-the-shelf (OTS) images as steps in Tekton tasks. A task author has no control over the image but may desire to ignore an error and continue executing the rest of the steps.
Design a step failure strategy so that the task author can control the behaviour of the underlying step and decide whether to continue executing the rest of the steps in the event of failure.
Store the step container's termination state and make it accessible to the rest of the steps in a task.
Be applicable to any container image including custom or off-the-shelf images.
This proposal is limited to a step within a task and does not address pipelineTask
level failure case.
-
Users should be able to use prebuilt images as-is without having to understand if a shell or similar capability exists in an image and then altering the entrypoint to allow capturing errors.
-
It should be possible to know that a step failed and subsequent steps allowed to continue by observing the status of the
TaskRun
. -
When a step is allowed to fail, the exit code of the process that failed should not be lost and should be accessible to the rest of the steps in that task and available in the status of the
TaskRun
.
-
As a task author, I would like to design a task where one or more steps running unit tests might fail, but want the task to succeed, so that a later task can analyze and report results.
-
As a new Tekton user, I want to migrate existing scripts and automations from other CI/CD systems that allowed a similar step unit of failure.
-
A platform team wants to share a
Task
with their team which runs the following steps in a sequence:- Run unit tests (which may fail)
- Apply a transformation to the test results (e.g., converts them to a certain format such as junit)
- Upload the results to a central location used by all the teams
Introduce a new field onError
as part of the
steps definition along with an image
and script
.
- name: failing-step
image: alpine
onError: [ continue | stopAndFail]
The Step
struct will have a new field Exit
:
type Step struct {
corev1.Container `json:",inline"`
// Script is the contents of an executable file to execute.
Script string `json:"script,omitempty"`
// ...
// define the exiting behavior of the container in this field
// set onError to stopAndFail to indicate the entrypoint to exit the taskRun if the container exits with non zero exit code
// set onError to continue to indicate the entrypoint to continue executing the rest of the steps irrespective of the container exit code
OnError string `json:"onError,omitempty"`
}
A task
author or a pipeline
author can use onError
to ignore the step error. If onError
is
set to continue
, the entrypoint sets the original failed exit code of the script
or the wrapped command in the
container termination state.
To ignore a step error, set the onError
to continue
:
steps:
- image: docker.io/library/golang:latest
name: ignore-unit-test-failure
onError: continue
script: |
go test .
A step
with onError
set to continue
does not fail the taskRun
and continues executing the rest of the steps in
a task. The original failed exit code of the wrapped command is available in the termination state of the container.
kubectl get tr taskrun-unit-test-t6qcl -o json | jq .status
{
"completionTime": "2021-06-21T18:22:06Z",
"conditions": [
{
"lastTransitionTime": "2021-06-21T18:22:06Z",
"message": "All Steps have completed executing",
"reason": "Succeeded",
"status": "True",
"type": "Succeeded"
}
],
"podName": "taskrun-unit-test-t6qcl-pod-zpqs9",
"startTime": "2021-06-21T18:21:57Z",
"steps": [
{
"container": "step-ignore-unit-test-failure",
"imageID": "...",
"name": "ignore-unit-test-failure",
"terminated": {
"containerID": "...",
"exitCode": 1,
"finishedAt": "2021-06-21T18:22:05Z",
"reason": "Completed",
"startedAt": "2021-06-21T18:22:05Z"
}
},
],
As part of this design, we are introducing an additional internal volume /tekton/steps/
. A file named exitCode
will
be created for each step to store the non-zero exit code, for example:
/tekton/steps/<step-name>/exitCode
<step-name>
will be replaced with the name of the step. If a step does not have any name, <step-name>
will be
replaced with step-unnamed-<step-index>
where <step-index>
is 0
for the first step, 1
for the second step, so
on and so forth.
This new internal volume /tekton/steps/<step-name>/
can be utilized in future to collect any metadata for each step.
And instead of referencing to it with the <step-name>
, will create a symlink such that it can be accessed using the
<step-index>
.
ln -s /tekton/steps/<step-name> /tekton/steps/<step-index>
Any subsequent step can access the non-zero exit code of a previous step using the path
similar to a task result,
for example:
$(steps.<step-name>.exitCode.path)
The exitCode
of a step without any name can be referenced using:
$(steps.step-unnamed-<step-index>.exitCode.path)
If you would like to use the tekton internal path, you can access the exit code by reading the file (it is not recommended though):
cat /tekton/steps/<step-name>/exitCode
And, access a step exit code without a step name:
cat /tekton/steps/step-unnamed-<step-index>/exitCode
In the following example, the pipelineRun
is executing two tasks. The first task is producing a result which is being
consumed by the second task. The first task has a step which can fail and therefore it is defined to
ignore an error of that step. The same step is producing a task result task1-result
. If that step is able to initialize
a result file before failing, that task result is made available to the second task (it's consuming task).
kubectl get pr pipelinerun-with-failing-step-mdncp -o json | jq .status.taskRuns | jq 'map(.status)'
[
{
"completionTime": "2021-06-21T18:47:40Z",
"conditions": [
{
"lastTransitionTime": "2021-06-21T18:47:40Z",
"message": "All Steps have completed executing",
"reason": "Succeeded",
"status": "True",
"type": "Succeeded"
}
],
"podName": "pipelinerun-with-failing-step-mdncp-task1-7gvl5-pod-dz5hb",
"startTime": "2021-06-21T18:47:32Z",
"steps": [
{
"container": "step-write-a-result",
"imageID": "...",
"name": "write-a-result",
"terminated": {
"containerID": "...",
"exitCode": 11,
"finishedAt": "2021-06-21T18:47:39Z",
"message": "[{\"key\":\"task1-result\",\"value\":\"123\",\"type\":\"TaskRunResult\"}]",
"reason": "Completed",
"startedAt": "2021-06-21T18:47:39Z"
}
}
],
"taskResults": [
{
"name": "task1-result",
"value": "123"
}
],
...
},
{
"completionTime": "2021-06-21T18:47:49Z",
"conditions": [
{
"lastTransitionTime": "2021-06-21T18:47:49Z",
"message": "All Steps have completed executing",
"reason": "Succeeded",
"status": "True",
"type": "Succeeded"
}
],
"podName": "pipelinerun-with-failing-step-mdncp-task2-9w7cj-pod-sw6sw",
"startTime": "2021-06-21T18:47:40Z",
"steps": [
{
"container": "step-verify-a-task-result",
"imageID": "...",
"name": "verify-a-task-result",
"terminated": {
"containerID": "...",
"exitCode": 0,
"finishedAt": "2021-06-21T18:47:49Z",
"reason": "Completed",
"startedAt": "2021-06-21T18:47:49Z"
}
}
],
...
}
]
Now, if a step fails before initializing a result, the pipeline
ignores such step failure. But, the pipeline
will fail with InvalidTaskResultReference
if it has a task consuming that task result. For example, any task
consuming $(tasks.task1.results.result2)
will cause the pipeline to fail since the step exited after initializing
result1
but before creating result2
:
steps:
- name: ignore-failure-and-produce-a-result
onError: continue
image: busybox
script: |
echo -n 123 | tee $(results.result1.path)
exit 1
echo -n 456 | tee $(results.result2.path)
This new field onError
will be implemented as a alpha
feature and can be enabled by setting enable-api-fields
to alpha
.
This proposal was demonstrated in API WG on 6/21/2021. A screen recording is also available here.
This is a very clean design in which the original failed exit code is part of the terminated state. There is no
separate placeholder needed for the failed exit code. There is no special logic needed to access the failed exit code.
exitCode
in the terminated state of the container can hold both zero/non-zero exit code. The dashboard team
can highlight this kind of step if the container terminated with a non-zero exitCode
.
Instead of introducing a new section, introduce a new bool
flag such as either captureExitCode
or
ignoreStepError
. By default, it will be set to false
. Set it to true
to ignore the step error.
This provides an option to a task
author or a pipeline
author to overwrite the original exit code with their
desired value. At the same time, it provides an option to continue treating that step as a failure since the step
exiting with any non-zero is considered a failure. This option implicitly supports changing the exit code:
exitCode
to0
: terminate the container with0
i.e., ignore step errorexitCode
to1
-255
: terminate the container with the specified value i.e., change the exit code
The volume mount /tekton/steps
is available to all the containers in a pod but not outside that pod i.e. a step exit
code is not accessible to any other task. To access a step exit code of any task from any other task, a task author
can introduce an additional step to write it as a task result.
- image: ubuntu
name: write-exit-code-result
script: |
cat /tekton/steps/0/exitCode > $(results.someStepExitCode.path)
Instead of asking a task author to create a task result in this way, we could create a task result for every non-zero exit code by design.
We have identified a few potential use cases in addition to ignoring a step error.
-
Force a step error: I want a process to fail in the step and don't really care about the exit code. If needed, this can be designed by introducing a new field
forceExit
:onError: [ continue | stopAndFail ] forceExit: [ true | false ]
-
Change the exit code of a step:
If linting exits with any non-zero exit code
- Prod: exit with 1 in prod
- Dev: ignore non-zero exit code and continue executing the rest of the pipeline.
This can be achieved by introducing a new field under
exit
.exitCode: [ 0 - 255 | DoNotChange ] onExit: [ continue | stopAndFail ] forceExit: [ true | false ]
These additional fields can be grouped in a single section exit
if needed. We can add onError
field under this new
section i.e. we can support both specifying onError
at the step specification level and under exit
section. The
decision to add such section can be delayed until we have a use case.
- Capture Exit Code, tektoncd/pipeline#2800
- Add a field to Step that allows it to ignore failed prior Steps *within the same Task, tektoncd/pipeline#1559
- Scott's Changes to allow steps to run regardless of previous step errors
- Christie's Notes - Thank You, Christie!
- Andrea's PoC
- PR Review Discussion
- Priti's PoC
- Demo
- Implementation in Pipeline Repo PR#4106