Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Oauth scheme and scope selection #1644

Closed
cbornet opened this issue Oct 2, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Oauth scheme and scope selection #1644

cbornet opened this issue Oct 2, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@cbornet
Copy link
Contributor

cbornet commented Oct 2, 2015

There are several issues dealing with Oauth scheme and scope selection:

  • if multiple schemes are defined in securityDefinitions (for instance "implicit1", "implicit2" and "accessCode"), it is not possible to choose which scheme to use for the oauth dance. The scheme used by swagger ui is undefined (see Swagger UI does not pick the correct OAuth endpoint during authentication #1410)
  • it should not be possible to choose scopes defined in different schemes
  • "password" and "application" flows scopes appear in the selectable scopes
@frol
Copy link

frol commented Nov 24, 2016

I think, the only missing part it this the Password Flow support. Everything else described here seems to be already addressed in #1825

@webron
Copy link
Contributor

webron commented Mar 20, 2017

@cbornet you being an active member, I'm not going to just close the ticket. Do you feel this is still an issue? Even with 3.0?

@cbornet
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbornet commented Mar 20, 2017

@webron I'll check ASAP but it's probably fixed.

@webron
Copy link
Contributor

webron commented Jun 9, 2017

@cbornet? :)

@cbornet
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbornet commented Jun 10, 2017

@webron this is fixed (at least on 3.0). Great job and sorry for the delay 😅

@cbornet cbornet closed this as completed Jun 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants