Relax pyjwt further

[zevisert]

This commit 81b897b changed your requirements from "PyJWT==2.0.*" to "PyJWT>=2.0.0 ,<=2.3.0", but even still that's IMO overly restrictive. PyJWT follows semantic versioning, so it appears to me that this project would be best off using "PyJWT>=2.0.0 ,<3.0.0" as it's dependency range.

[zevisert]

Just using github code search, it doesn't seem like pyjwt is directly imported anywhere. I get why this project would want to use pyjwt, but it seems like it's not using it.

Python projects don't need to require transitive dependencies, so pyjwt could perhaps even be removed

[KShivendu]

Hi @zevisert, thanks for raising this issue. This is indeed a valid point. I'll do the changes right away :)

Regarding the 2nd comment, I think there's a misunderstanding because of package import name. Try searching for from jwt (search results)

[rishabhpoddar]

This has been fixed in python SDK version >= 0.11.13