Skip to content

issues Search Results · repo:substantial/updeep language:JavaScript

Filter by

56 results
 (56 ms)

56 results

insubstantial/updeep (press backspace or delete to remove)

substantial/updeep
LICENSE and authors for Remeda fork

Hi again! So I m almost ready to punt out the Remeda fork (https://github.com/yanick/updeep-remeda) Before I do so, I just need a thumb up from you. Since the fork is essentially building on the original ...
  • yanick
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Jan 10, 2023
  • #743

substantial/updeep
Remeda port of Updeep

Not a bug at all; I just wanted to share my little experiment of today: I forked Updeep to use Remeda as its core library, and using TypeScript from the ground up. Details are available at https://techblog.babyl.ca/entry/updeep-remeda/, ...
  • yanick
  • 1
  • Opened 
    on Jan 3, 2023
  • #739

substantial/updeep
CirclieCI build is failing

CircleCI build is presently failing. I ll investigate and open a PR when I figure it out. I ll probably start by updating to a non-deprecated image. Example: https://github.com/substantial/updeep/pull/736/checks?check_run_id=9527056437 ...
  • DaneWeber
  • Opened 
    on Dec 6, 2022
  • #737

substantial/updeep
issue

  • qaautomateio
  • Opened 
    on Jun 9, 2022
  • #734

substantial/updeep
Not defaulting to array if key is number as shown in docs

Not sure if this is a regression or if the docs are out of date, but in the example shown.. var result = u({ 0: foo , 1: bar }, null); expect(result).to.eql([ foo , bar ]); actual: { 0 : foo , 1 : bar ...
  • nol13
  • Opened 
    on Apr 29, 2020
  • #311

substantial/updeep
Confusing/inconsistent merging

Looking at this code: updeep({ a: { b: value } }, { a: test }) I was expecting the output to be: { a: { b: value } } However, the output was actually: { a: { 0 : t , 1 : e , 2 : s , 3 ...
  • wdoug
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Sep 9, 2019
  • #149

substantial/updeep
Support for array element insert and remove

It would be nice to have built in support for these very common trivial array manipulations. I think simple helper functions like Updeep.addToArray = newValue = existingValues = existingValues ? [...existingValues, ...
  • apackin
  • 1
  • Opened 
    on May 16, 2019
  • #126

substantial/updeep
Uncaught ReferenceError: process is not defined

When running a project which has indirect updeep dependency I get the following error in a browser: image The browser has problems with lib/freeze.js line 32 if (process.env.UPDEEP_MODE === dangerously_never_freeze ...
  • amourzenkov-sc
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Apr 16, 2019
  • #117

substantial/updeep
add typescript types

It d be nice to have a types.d.ts typescript type file available for updeep. For what it s worth, I began to play with this at https://github.com/yanick/updeep/tree/typescript For the sake of getting ...
  • yanick
  • 10
  • Opened 
    on Jan 11, 2019
  • #81

substantial/updeep
documentation: omitBy section example lacks closing curly braces

In the example it says var result = u({ user: u.omitBy(isSensitive, user); I understand they corrent way to write it is. var result = u({ user: u.omitBy(isSensitive)}, user);
  • ancodeUDW
  • 1
  • Opened 
    on Mar 9, 2018
  • #75
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Restrict your search to the title by using the in:title qualifier.
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Restrict your search to the title by using the in:title qualifier.
Issue search results · GitHub