Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Connectivity and service discovery should be full-blown components #1102

Closed
skitt opened this issue Feb 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Connectivity and service discovery should be full-blown components #1102

skitt opened this issue Feb 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request technical-debt wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@skitt
Copy link
Member

skitt commented Feb 22, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Handling of connectivity and service discovery as components should allow them to be fully pluggable, i.e. they should provide a common interface which subctl or any other implementations can use without knowing details.

(This started off as a request to make Globalnet a component, but Globalnet doesn’t fit into a component model and this will need to be reconsidered for Globalnet 2 anyway.)
@skitt skitt added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 22, 2021
@skitt skitt self-assigned this Feb 22, 2021
@skitt skitt mentioned this issue Feb 22, 2021
Merged
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 23, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please make a comment if this issue/pr is still valid. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Apr 23, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed May 1, 2021
@skitt skitt changed the title Globalnet should be a component too Connectivity and service discovery should be full-blown components May 6, 2021
@skitt skitt reopened this May 6, 2021
@stale stale bot removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label May 6, 2021
@skitt skitt removed their assignment May 6, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 5, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please make a comment if this issue/pr is still valid. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jul 5, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 12, 2021
@nyechiel nyechiel removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jul 13, 2021
@nyechiel nyechiel reopened this Jul 26, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 23, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please make a comment if this issue/pr is still valid. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Nov 23, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Dec 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request technical-debt wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@skitt @nyechiel