Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Helm over Operator as default deploy tool #137

Closed
Tracked by #138
dfarrell07 opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed
Tracked by #138

Use Helm over Operator as default deploy tool #137

dfarrell07 opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority:medium size:large wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@dfarrell07
Copy link
Member

What would you like to be added:

Use the submariner-operator Helm chart to deploy the Operator as the default deployment method throughout our CI, instead of subctl to deploy the Operator.

The current operator deploy method could be renamed subctl and run as an additional job in the submariner-operator repo.

Why is this needed:

To provide test coverage for both Helm and the Operator without adding a substantial number of extra jobs.

@dfarrell07
Copy link
Member Author

Talking about this on the Automation Sync today, there didn't seem to be consensus that Helm+Operator should be the default throughout our CI. It should clearly be tested much more than it is throughout our CI, but folks pointed out that we currently recommend users use subctl constantly and so that might should be the default. I think discussions will continue as Helm gets fixed up. The topic of the number of jobs required for coverage wasn't considered.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 18, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please make a comment if this issue/pr is still valid. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Nov 18, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Nov 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority:medium size:large wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant