Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discuss the Need for Additional Security Measures in Smart Contracts #379

Open
zethe7 opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@zethe7
Copy link

zethe7 commented Jan 7, 2025

Description:
The smart contracts of Story Protocol play a critical role in ensuring the reliability and security of the system. However, to minimize the risk of potential attacks, it is essential to discuss and implement additional security measures.

Goals:

  1. Consider the use of the Checks-Effects-Interactions (CEI) pattern to prevent vulnerabilities related to reentrancy.
  2. Discuss implementing a reentrancy guard mechanism (e.g., using OpenZeppelin's library) to secure critical functions.
  3. Conduct an audit of existing smart contracts to identify vulnerabilities such as:
    Reentrancy attacks.
    Overflow/underflow issues.
    Potential errors in fund distribution logic.
    Vulnerabilities related to delegatecall or call.

Proposed Steps:
Analyze critical functions like transfer, withdraw, and mint for the need for additional checks.
Implement basic protection mechanisms in key parts of the code.
Develop a plan for regular security audits of smart contracts (including internal audits and possibly engaging third-party organizations).

Expected Outcomes:
Improved overall system security.
Reduced risk of attacks exploiting known vulnerabilities.
Increased community trust in the protocol.

@Ramarti
Copy link

Ramarti commented Feb 20, 2025

We have successfully passed multiple audits, reports available in audits folder.
A Cantina competition is wrapping up

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants