-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 158
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HasManyDeep::one() Doesn't Seem To Work As Expected #249
Comments
Hi @MannikJ, |
I released a new version with support for "Funnily" enough, |
😅 Thank you for addressing this so quickly! |
Yeah... |
I encountered errors when trying to convert a HasManyDeep relation to a HasOneX relation although the HasManyDeep relation itself works. The "one"-relation uses wrong column names etc.
In fact the first thing I noticed was that HasManyDeep::one() will return a HasOneThrough relation instead of HasOneDeep as I would expecet. The reason for this is that HasManyDeep does not (yet) overwrite the implementation of the one() function from its parent class HasManyThrough.
Maybe this feature was just overseen or not yet implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: