Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate a better way of calling route() outside of multitenanted context #76

Closed
ollieread opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #77
Closed

Investigate a better way of calling route() outside of multitenanted context #76

ollieread opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #77
Assignees
Labels
status: investigating The issue is being investigated status: planning The issue is being planned for the future type: feat New feature
Milestone

Comments

@ollieread
Copy link
Member

Currently, resolvers that use route parameters will automatically set the default value for the route parameter, but only when inside multitenanted context. Generating a URL using the route() helper from outside this context is currently less than ideal.

Look for a better solution.

@ollieread ollieread self-assigned this Dec 15, 2024
@ollieread ollieread converted this from a draft issue Dec 15, 2024
@ollieread ollieread added type: feat New feature status: investigating The issue is being investigated status: planning The issue is being planned for the future labels Dec 15, 2024
@ollieread ollieread added this to the V1 Release milestone Dec 15, 2024
@ollieread ollieread moved this from Ready to Backlog in Sprout Development Dec 15, 2024
@ollieread ollieread linked a pull request Dec 15, 2024 that will close this issue
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Done in Sprout Development Dec 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: investigating The issue is being investigated status: planning The issue is being planned for the future type: feat New feature
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant