New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Generic or OS-Climate specific? #2

Open

j08lue opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 0 comments

j08lue commented Nov 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

I take it the extension is modelled after output from the OS-Climate hazard models.

Is it still meant to be potentially applicable to other climate hazard datasets?

The practical implication - should the field name prefix be osc-hazard: like

hazard-extension/json-schema/schema.json

Lines 29 to 33 in 77bb29e

    
           "osc-hazard:hazard_version", 
        
           "osc-hazard:id", 
        
           "osc-hazard:hazard_kind", 
        
           "osc-hazard:name", 
        
           "osc-hazard:description"

or perhaps something not implementation-specific, like clim-hazard:?

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment