Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Valores para validar o algoritmo de descolamento #8

Open
pictos opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

Valores para validar o algoritmo de descolamento #8

pictos opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 6 comments
Labels
in progress Actively being worked on. proposal Proposed feature or enhancement.

Comments

@pictos
Copy link

pictos commented Jan 28, 2019

Olá a todos, vou falar em pt-BR, pois pelo que vi não tem nenhum estrangeiro - ainda - no projeto. Para validar o algoritmo de descolamento acho válido termos ao menos 3 posições conhecidas... No caso posição inicial (antes do acidente) e a posição após o acidente.

Como referência pensei em usar a posição do centro administrativo/refeitório e da pousada.
Posição inicial

  • 20.1310227,-44.1236331 => escritório Vale
  • 20.1395884,-44.1268049,681 => pousada arrastada (pousada Nova Estância)

Posição final
Infelizmente não consegui encontrar informações da posição final, caso alguém tenha será de grande ajuda... As informações divulgadas são muito vagas, como por exemplo "provavelmente foi arrastado pela lama e pode ter ido parar a "até quilômetros à frente"."

Espero que a ideia sirva para vocês.

@brunolcarli
Copy link

As suggested on #13

English:

To validate the detach algorithm I find valid terms at least 3 known positions ... In the case initial position (before the accident) and the position after the accident.

As a reference I thought of using the position of the administrative center / cafeteria and the inn.
Initial position

  • 20.1310227,-44.1236331 => vale office

  • 20.1395884, -44.1268049,681 => Traveled Hostel (Nova Estancia Hostel)

Final position
Unfortunately I could not find information on the final position, if anyone has it will be of great help ... The information disclosed is very vague, for example "probably was dragged by the mud and may have gone to" up to miles ahead. ""

I hope the idea works for you.

@panisson
Copy link

My suggestion if you want to build a solid system for giving possible coordinates for search teams is to give this high priority, since any model that might be proposed here would need a ground truth dataset to validate its performance.

I think you can build this dataset in two ways:

  1. with the help of rescue teams, who can give the coordinates of known constructions/objects after the incident, and compare the coordinates with the same objects before the incident; or
  2. using aerial images and crowdsourcing, where online volunteers can help to match in aerial maps objects that can be found before and after the incident.

Such ground truth data is imperative to estimate the right parameters for more complex predictive models, and to validate them.

@caiocarrara caiocarrara transferred this issue from sosbrumadinho/brumadinho_location Jan 31, 2019
@guidiego
Copy link

Hello guys! I love mathematics and physics and actually, I'm working with molecular modeling at a university. I think that first, we need to base our algorithm in a formula based on theoretical data like kinetic energy, velocity vectors, and density formulas after it we can apply data and improve the model in other layers after this base formula.

Right now I'm working on an issue to explain some ideas for this algorithm!

@pictos
Copy link
Author

pictos commented Jan 31, 2019

#1

@pictos pictos added proposal Proposed feature or enhancement. needs more discussion This needs more discussion or info before discussing it as a proposal. labels Feb 1, 2019
@jsmatias
Copy link

jsmatias commented Feb 7, 2019

As suggested on #13

English:

To validate the detach algorithm I find valid terms at least 3 known positions ... In the case initial position (before the accident) and the position after the accident.

As a reference I thought of using the position of the administrative center / cafeteria and the inn.
Initial position

  • 20.1310227,-44.1236331 => vale office
  • 20.1395884, -44.1268049,681 => Traveled Hostel (Nova Estancia Hostel)

Final position
Unfortunately I could not find information on the final position, if anyone has it will be of great help ... The information disclosed is very vague, for example "probably was dragged by the mud and may have gone to" up to miles ahead. ""

I hope the idea works for you.

Hello guys!
Some students from USP, ITA and me were working in a model based on Gradient descent for this problem.

Using these values above as initial position and an average mass equal to 80 kg, we got this result:
image

The map shows only the mud flow and after calculation based on drift force, we got a final position as being: (lat: -20.127900, lon: -44.120729). If one put it on google maps, he/she will get a weird result, however the initial segmentation of the map still has to be more fragmented to improve accuracy. Besides that, this is an initial model and shall be improved.
If you have any ideas, please have a look to review and validate it.

https://github.com/jsmatias/victims_location_prediction

@pictos
Copy link
Author

pictos commented Feb 8, 2019

@jsmatias thanks for your time. We working in your PR.

@pictos pictos added in progress Actively being worked on. and removed needs more discussion This needs more discussion or info before discussing it as a proposal. labels Feb 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in progress Actively being worked on. proposal Proposed feature or enhancement.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants