You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Publishing several samples/requests into a single multireport is using one of them as the primary one to:
displaying common information in the report header, although some might differ in detail (e.g.client contact, batch info).
determining the location of the saved report (if not saved individually)
The word primary implies a kind of first of something, so it is confusing for users to recognize the actual primary request, because of contradicting expectations:
In publish view the list of samples is determined by the current sort order of the calling sample view, which can vary by user task. So the first entry is highly at random.
In the multireport header adress, contact, batch information are based on the oldest sample, samples are sorted ascending by date (which is a good default behaviour IMO).
The pdf of the multireport is saved to the latest sample (changed newly, see Use most recent AR as primary storage #52), so you won't find it easily again having one of the other ways in mind.
So I propose to make this work in a more consistent and user-friendly way.
IMHO the first sample in the sample list (preferably in ascending order) should be considered as the primary one and should receive the saved pdf too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Publishing several samples/requests into a single multireport is using one of them as the primary one to:
The word primary implies a kind of first of something, so it is confusing for users to recognize the actual primary request, because of contradicting expectations:
So I propose to make this work in a more consistent and user-friendly way.
IMHO the first sample in the sample list (preferably in ascending order) should be considered as the primary one and should receive the saved pdf too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: