Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(baremetal): add wait support delete server #3669

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

Laure-di
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Laure-di Laure-di self-assigned this Feb 20, 2024
@Laure-di Laure-di force-pushed the feat/add-wait-delete-server branch from b4647f8 to 6cc66e5 Compare February 20, 2024 16:00
@Laure-di Laure-di force-pushed the feat/add-wait-delete-server branch from 6cc66e5 to 7ad6f99 Compare February 20, 2024 16:07
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: 15 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (fd9f90a) 75.87% compared to head (7ad6f99) 75.84%.

Files Patch % Lines
...l/namespaces/baremetal/v1/custome_server_delete.go 11.76% 14 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3669      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.87%   75.84%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         189      190       +1     
  Lines       42597    42615      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits        32319    32322       +3     
- Misses       9091     9105      +14     
- Partials     1187     1188       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@remyleone remyleone added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into scaleway:master with commit 601930a Feb 21, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants