-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 466
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prelexer alternatives fails with 7 arguments #745
Comments
What's the error? It appears that |
No error, it would just fail to match. I took a (really?) quick look for difference between the 6 and 7 arg versions. You're probably right. I'll give it a shot. |
I guess that's what I get for copying and pasting code :-/. If you're already committed to using C++11, then maybe the |
We're committed to |
I would speak against using the full feature set of cpp11, it already intoduced some headaches for the node-sass people since they provide prebuilt binaries. Some people still seem to be on systems which only provide gcc 4.4. ... |
Cool. It'd be good to have guidelines on what will cause pain for people in gcc <= 4.4. |
Pretty funny that this emerges the day I tried to compile it with gcc 4.4.4 => mgreter@14e1d7a |
Needless to say replacing things with C does not thrill me. |
Sorry, should be std c++ 99 😉 But I know, C++11 has some nice syntax sugar. Specially looping over containers, which is what we mostly use beside the other two features, which are much harder to replace (I guess). |
During the development of #744 I ran into issue with this
it works however if any argument is removed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: