We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
root@uslogdcnas04:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/saltstack.list deb http://repo.saltstack.com/apt/debian/8/amd64/latest Debian 8 GNU/Linux main (jessie) root@uslogdcnas04:~#
It looks like map.jinja is generating that part by looking at salt['grains.get']('oscodename').
salt['grains.get']('oscodename')
On that particular machine, the oscodename grain returns:
oscodename
oscodename: Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie)
I polled ~100 other machines on my network, and they all return 'jessie', 'wheezy', 'trusty', etc...so I don't think it's a problem with the formula.
After doing a bit more research, it looks like it might be related to this issue: saltstack/salt#30123
I'm going to file a bug against salt and I'll link the two of them shortly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Link for related bug in Salt: saltstack/salt#34423
Sorry, something went wrong.
closing issue, upstream saltstack/salt#34423 is closed
No branches or pull requests
It looks like map.jinja is generating that part by looking at
salt['grains.get']('oscodename')
.On that particular machine, the
oscodename
grain returns:I polled ~100 other machines on my network, and they all return 'jessie', 'wheezy', 'trusty', etc...so I don't think it's a problem with the formula.
After doing a bit more research, it looks like it might be related to this issue: saltstack/salt#30123
I'm going to file a bug against salt and I'll link the two of them shortly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: