Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

generic interface to latte count: workaround for a LattE flaw #22577

Closed
mkoeppe opened this issue Mar 10, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

generic interface to latte count: workaround for a LattE flaw #22577

mkoeppe opened this issue Mar 10, 2017 · 9 comments

Comments

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented Mar 10, 2017

This is a follow-up on #22497.

This gives an error -- because LattE forgets to print the answer on stdout in this particular case.

        sage: P = Polyhedron(vertices=[[0,0,0]])
        sage: cddin = P.cdd_Hrepresentation()
        sage: count(cddin, cdd=True, raw_output=False)  # optional - latte_int

The easy fix is on a branch that is on top of #22497.

Depends on #22497

CC: @videlec

Component: interfaces

Keywords: days84

Author: Matthias Koeppe

Branch/Commit: 51a6111

Reviewer: Vincent Delecroix

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22577

@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-7.6 milestone Mar 10, 2017
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Mar 10, 2017

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Mar 10, 2017

Commit: 51a6111

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Mar 10, 2017

New commits:

d5ff15422497: generic interface to LattE integrale count
51a6111count: Handle a case in which LattE prints no output

@mkoeppe

This comment has been minimized.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Mar 10, 2017

Changed keywords from none to days84

@videlec
Copy link
Contributor

videlec commented Mar 10, 2017

comment:3

no merge conflicts with #22522? (touching the same file)

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Mar 10, 2017

comment:4

No merge conflicts.

@videlec
Copy link
Contributor

videlec commented Mar 10, 2017

Reviewer: Vincent Delecroix

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Mar 11, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants