From 1e05baea07c13613db119da149664ab189bfc994 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: bluss <bluss@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:21:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] MAINT: Allow another clippy lint

This one complains about if let Some(_) = option; which I still think is
just as fine as if option.is_some(); `if let` is a nice Rust feature
that works the same way on all enums, no reason to prefer
option-specific methods like `is_some`.
---
 src/lib.rs | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/src/lib.rs b/src/lib.rs
index 37af0adfe..fca7e443c 100644
--- a/src/lib.rs
+++ b/src/lib.rs
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #![doc(html_logo_url = "https://rust-ndarray.github.io/images/rust-ndarray_logo.svg")]
 #![allow(
     unstable_name_collisions, // our `PointerExt` collides with upcoming inherent methods on `NonNull`
+    clippy::redundant_pattern_matching, // if let is sometimes good style
     clippy::many_single_char_names,
     clippy::deref_addrof,
     clippy::unreadable_literal,