We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustc 1.0.0 (a59de37 2015-05-13) (built 2015-05-14) binary: rustc commit-hash: a59de37 commit-date: 2015-05-13 build-date: 2015-05-14 host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu release: 1.0.0
I wanted to check this code successfully compiles. Gave a "cargo test" instead of "build", and kaboom.
#[test] fn yerler() { fn utule(arr: &[[u8]]) -> [u8; 81] { let mut newarr = [0_u8; 81]; for i in 0..10 { for j in 0..10 { newarr[i*9+j] = arr[i][j]; } } newarr } }
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'assertion failed: slice_layout_is_correct(cx, &member_llvm_types[..], element_type)', /home/rustbuild/src/rust-buildbot/slave/stable-dist-rustc-linux/build/src/librustc_trans/trans/debuginfo.rs:2810 stack backtrace: 1: 0x7f4abb29e449 - sys::backtrace::write::hbc46dc0cfb3b9537d4r 2: 0x7f4abb2a6156 - panicking::on_panic::h74d3c14d86c58ac8jrw 3: 0x7f4abb269462 - rt::unwind::begin_unwind_inner::h382cea404b11eb00t6v 4: 0x7f4aba96437e - rt::unwind::begin_unwind::h11527883117899559464 5: 0x7f4abaa65f33 - trans::debuginfo::vec_slice_metadata::hf94e0b5f0c2f2a50cgy 6: 0x7f4abaa517fc - trans::debuginfo::type_metadata::h61fa8cb587a59ac0Ioy 7: 0x7f4abaa664c0 - trans::debuginfo::subroutine_type_metadata::h0a8adba26e117853iky 8: 0x7f4abaa511d4 - trans::debuginfo::type_metadata::h61fa8cb587a59ac0Ioy 9: 0x7f4aba9bd8b6 - trans::debuginfo::create_function_debug_context::hce33e3e89c0b549eG0w 10: 0x7f4aba9bbd16 - trans::base::new_fn_ctxt::hc47263521fb5ebc7Djh 11: 0x7f4aba9c4f10 - trans::base::trans_closure::h8e5687f4ccb96c5eLCh 12: 0x7f4aba9c90ea - trans::base::trans_fn::h0bc8fb6dbe17d6adtNh 13: 0x7f4aba9cc177 - trans::base::trans_item::h4f9c99b1e4474396Fbi 14: 0x7f4aba9d2ed5 - visit::walk_block::h14547825370956947583 15: 0x7f4aba9cca16 - trans::base::trans_item::h4f9c99b1e4474396Fbi 16: 0x7f4aba9da56d - trans::base::trans_crate::haa02506df24d5efcF0i 17: 0x7f4abb7ec0fa - driver::phase_4_translate_to_llvm::h86d6fb84c5c936d5hOa 18: 0x7f4abb7c3faa - driver::compile_input::hb78754f2f33c01efQba 19: 0x7f4abb8854d1 - run_compiler::h258d36d5501c1cdfz4b 20: 0x7f4abb883122 - boxed::F.FnBox<A>::call_box::h7239693171334256553 21: 0x7f4abb882659 - rt::unwind::try::try_fn::h14329119008520845439 22: 0x7f4abb318ac8 - rust_try_inner 23: 0x7f4abb318ab5 - rust_try 24: 0x7f4abb882908 - boxed::F.FnBox<A>::call_box::h17332056298259451807 25: 0x7f4abb2a5041 - sys::thread::create::thread_start::h490278b5c3c0b49faqv 26: 0x7f4ab5b2cdf4 - start_thread 27: 0x7f4abaeef1ac - __clone 28: 0x0 - <unknown>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I can confirm this affects rustc 1.2.0-nightly (7c4eedc21 2015-05-25) (built 2015-05-25) as well.
rustc 1.2.0-nightly (7c4eedc21 2015-05-25) (built 2015-05-25)
Sorry, something went wrong.
I’d eat a shoe if this not a duplicate of #24707.
Yeah looks like a dupe, closing in favor of #24707.
No branches or pull requests
rustc 1.0.0 (a59de37 2015-05-13) (built 2015-05-14)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: a59de37
commit-date: 2015-05-13
build-date: 2015-05-14
host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
release: 1.0.0
I wanted to check this code successfully compiles. Gave a "cargo test" instead of "build", and kaboom.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: