Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tracking Issue for PowerPC arch intrinsics #111145

Open
2 tasks
Amanieu opened this issue May 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
2 tasks

Tracking Issue for PowerPC arch intrinsics #111145

Amanieu opened this issue May 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC O-PowerPC Target: PowerPC processors T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@Amanieu
Copy link
Member

Amanieu commented May 3, 2023

Feature gate: #![feature(stdarch_powerpc)]

This is a tracking issue for the PowerPC intrinsics in core::arch::{powerpc,powerpc64}.

Public API

Everything in core::arch::{powerpc,powerpc64}}.

Steps / History

  • Final comment period (FCP)1
  • Stabilization PR

Unresolved Questions

  • None yet.

Footnotes

  1. https://std-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/feature-lifecycle/stabilization.html ↩
@Amanieu Amanieu added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC labels May 3, 2023
@Jules-Bertholet
Copy link
Contributor

@rustbot label O-PowerPC

@rustbot rustbot added the O-PowerPC Target: PowerPC processors label May 4, 2023
@Amanieu Amanieu mentioned this issue Oct 26, 2023
Merged
@zachs18 zachs18 mentioned this issue Feb 8, 2024
Closed
@Amanieu Amanieu mentioned this issue Mar 10, 2024
Closed
3 tasks
@beetrees
Copy link
Contributor

beetrees commented Sep 2, 2024

When the vsx feature is not enabled the floating-point intrinsics currently handle subnormals unsoundly: #129886

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

What's the relationship between this and #[feature(powerpc_target_feature)]? This is for libs side while powerpc_target_feature is compiler side?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC O-PowerPC Target: PowerPC processors T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@Amanieu @jieyouxu @rustbot @Jules-Bertholet @beetrees