Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

handle supecharger clutch f21 #10

Closed
duhafnusa4 opened this issue Jul 17, 2021 · 23 comments
Closed

handle supecharger clutch f21 #10

duhafnusa4 opened this issue Jul 17, 2021 · 23 comments
Assignees

Comments

@duhafnusa4
Copy link

duhafnusa4 commented Jul 17, 2021

On Hellen 128 Pin Mercedes Pin KF21 is associated to ignition, but on the stock ECU that pin is for engaging the supercharger clutch (pin pulls low to trigger relay that feeds clutch 12V)

We need an option to use a MOSFET instead of igbt on that pin, with corresponding 0R jumpers

Update: igbt does exactly low side just too much heat at 5A for instance. 3.4 ohms resistance of that solenoid.

@rusefillc rusefillc transferred this issue from rusefi/rusefi Jul 17, 2021
@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

@mck1117
Copy link

mck1117 commented Jul 17, 2021

Maybe not move, but jumper. Some cars have ign on that pin.

@mck1117
Copy link

mck1117 commented Aug 16, 2021

image

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

@mck1117 how did you hack this board for now?

@mck1117
Copy link

mck1117 commented Aug 18, 2021

I didn't really hack the board, @duhafnusa4 hacked his harness.

He moved ign 1 is to one of the pins on channel5 (F4 or F5).

His supercharger clutch has a relay, connected to pin F21, so the IGBT is installed there as a low side driver. This is NOT the factor wiring for the supercharger.

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

Matthew Kennedy 5:18 PM
Huh?

andrey 5:18 PM
@jimmy soiboi Luntzel says "relay" in ticket and "low"

Matthew Kennedy 5:18 PM
Yes
5:18
He added a relay so the ecu switches lowside
5:18
Because he had MRE before
5:18
IGBT can switch lowside

andrey 5:18 PM
https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/wiki/OEM-Docs/Mercedes/99_SLK230_3.png
5:18
does not OEM switched lowside?

Matthew Kennedy 5:18 PM
Dunno
5:18
Where does that wire go left side?

andrey 5:19 PM
see https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/wiki/OEM-Docs/Mercedes/99_SLK230_3.png

Matthew Kennedy 5:19 PM
We thought it was maybe high side but I never actually looked at the schematic

andrey 5:19 PM
also https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/wiki/OEM-Docs/Mercedes/99_SLK230_2.png

Matthew Kennedy 5:19 PM
Looks low side to me

andrey 5:19 PM
not ECU wire goes to +12v

Matthew Kennedy 5:19 PM
Yeah

andrey 5:19 PM
but also high current

Matthew Kennedy 5:20 PM
@jimmy soiboi Luntzel you around? Can you measure ohms of the blower clutch?

andrey 5:20 PM
maybe @jimmy soiboi Luntzel needed high current so he added relay since MRE not high current?

Matthew Kennedy 5:20 PM
Igbt can do huge current but they're inefficient
5:20
*at low voltages

andrey 5:20 PM
how is Igbt not what board has for igniters?
5:20
i.e. is "Igbt" different from what we use for dump coils?

Matthew Kennedy 5:21 PM
Dumb coils have exactly igbt

andrey 5:21 PM
or is the point that Jimmy needed 3rd Igbt or first Igbt due to smart coils?

Matthew Kennedy 5:21 PM
If that clutch pulls 5 amps, it's too much heat

5:21
He has 4 jumpers for smart coils on channels 2345

andrey 5:21 PM
"jimmy added Igbt like rev A is asking for for dump coil"

Matthew Kennedy 5:21 PM
And an igbt acting as lowside switch on SC
5:21
On ign1

andrey 5:22 PM
so a better hack would be through hole mosfet soldered to those pads
5:22
or just a mosfet with matching pinout maybe?

Matthew Kennedy 5:22 PM
I think most/all mosfets have backwards pinout from IGBT
New
5:23
That doesn't solve the problem that ign output 1 and blower are tied together on those two pins

andrey 5:24 PM
what pins? why tied together?
5:24
what car seems problematic?

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

Matthew Kennedy
both F20 and F21 are IGN1 on some car

I don't know if any car uses F20=IGN and F21=SC at the same time

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

Matthew Kennedy 5:36 PM
so yes, it needs either a relay or a bodgewire
5:37
*bodge mosfet

@Qwerty-OFF
Copy link
Collaborator

Can we use any unused IGBT for this?
image

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

I think there is heat dissipation concerns? Do you mean multiple IGBTs in parallel? Maybe 4 IGBTs in parallel is the answer @mck1117 ?

@mck1117
Copy link

mck1117 commented Aug 23, 2021

noo, please don't do that. IGBTs have a roughly fixed voltage drop (not resistance), and it's like ~2 volts for these IGBTs. Blower clutch could pull north of 4-5 amps.

@Qwerty-OFF
Copy link
Collaborator

Can we use BTS3028 or something else in d2pak package for replace this IGBT?

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

we are not REPLACING right, we are ADDING an alternative option for when we need clutch control not spark coil control?

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

rusefillc commented Aug 24, 2021

replacement suggestion BTS3028

image

@rusefillc rusefillc self-assigned this Aug 24, 2021
@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

rusefillc commented Aug 24, 2021

IBGT ISL9V3040S3S
gate=in
collector=drain
emitter=source

image

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

@Qwerty-OFF please share exact full PN of BTS3028 with proper package

@rusefillc rusefillc removed their assignment Aug 24, 2021
@andreika-git
Copy link
Collaborator

pinout looks good

@mck1117
Copy link

mck1117 commented Aug 24, 2021

it might be a little marginal on current capacity, the clutch could be 5 amps, which on a bts3028 would be 2.3 watts. Anything available with lower R_ds_on?

Besides, the BTS3028 is DPAK, not D2PAK.

@Qwerty-OFF
Copy link
Collaborator

VNB14NV04
BTS3018TC
BTS141TC
BTS133TC

@mck1117
Copy link

mck1117 commented Aug 24, 2021

I like that ST part if availability is ok

@Qwerty-OFF
Copy link
Collaborator

image

@Qwerty-OFF
Copy link
Collaborator

User can install IGBT or MOSFET with corresponding jumpers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants