Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transfer requirements from notes doc to GH Issues #2

Closed
pterygaphykion opened this issue May 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Transfer requirements from notes doc to GH Issues #2

pterygaphykion opened this issue May 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@pterygaphykion
Copy link

Convert requirements from the Project Requirements doc to github issues so we can track milestones.

@jgaehring
Copy link
Contributor

I moved those requirements to a new public repository, since it covers 2 separate interventions for the pilot project with RGO, this Early Warning System being only one. I figure that way it can live there for future reference and provide a broader overview of our aims at the outset of this. And as we explore other projects, it can be sort of public forum for further discussion of topics outside the scope of this repo specifically. I also added a qualification to the requirements:

Below is an outline of proposed features for the interventions above. Although they may not be "requirements" in the strictest sense, they can serve as "gestures" towards a few potential outcomes, as we iterate on a practicable solution.

I'll try to map the better defined features from that list onto issues here, taking into account some of the more technical limitations, so it won't be a strict 1-to-1 mapping, but should provide us with a few starting points.

@jgaehring
Copy link
Contributor

Okay, I added the following issues which I think are needed for the first MVP:

This does not include any semi-automated submissions from the farmers themselves (eg, via SurveyStack), let alone fully automated sensor readings. Nor does it address more complex evaluation of things like distance from the central office to each farm, pending orders, etc. Those can come later, but the above features, once implemented, should be sufficient for a first MVP that we can put in users' hands. Even #7 and #8 are probably not absolutely necessary.

Should we group them into a milestone then?

@jgaehring jgaehring added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label May 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants